Total Pageviews

Showing posts sorted by relevance for query barry summers. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query barry summers. Sort by date Show all posts

Thursday, 21 August 2014

DCUK Quote of the day !

"It was a link to a forum containing threads that berate and belittle members from this forum, as well as encouraging the belief that this forum is corrupt for whatever reason. I don't consider that helpful or constructive and don't wish for that kind of nonsense to be spread here." Giverny Admin on the Are private conversations moderated thread.

This is was what I said.

Apologies to anyone who was offended or annoyed by this thread I started. Although I wrote in a somewhat jocular fashion, there was a serious point to my post. I find it very difficult to ignore, 'reading the largest diabetes forum in Europe' that my fellow low carbers are either liars or posting low carb propaganda rubbish on a regular basis. 

I believe there are commercial reasons for why 'the largest diabetes forum in Europe' has allowed the aforementioned type of posts to continue for years. That being said, I will endeavour to find a more attractive method of stating my case on this forum another time. I will say this at this stage, if this forum becomes a place of censorship, or certain important issues become no go areas, it will not be doing anyone any favours. 

Now why would I think the DCUK forum had commercial reasons for allowing low carbers to be called liars and spreaders of rubbish ? Could it be they have used the members list as a sales mailshot list for years. Could it be because they looking to tie in with, or off load the forum to big pharma as stated by the Sales Director Barry Summers. BTW Barry done a Nobblyhead and deleted all the below after I posted the full sales pitch and link on this thread here. Now, was that a coincidence or what ? My red text then and now.

A week ago

"We are interested to hear from investors, M&A groups, strategic partners, health insurance or pharmaceutical companies who have an interest in improving outcomes in the management and control of diabetes throughout the world. An ideal turn key beyond the pill distribution channel"

Now

"Interested to hear from organisations who have an interest in improving diabetes health outcomes.

Diabetes.co.uk engages beyond the pill and our results stand at the forefront of the digital health landscape"


So there you have it, a massive coincidence or are DCUK wanting to hide their true intentions ? one thing can never be denied, nothing is ever what it appears to be on the forum of flog.

BTW I never used the word corrupt in my post, I wonder why Giv is thinking about corruption. As always, follow the money.

Eddie

Tuesday, 9 September 2014

DCUK How to do a deal with big pharma and play the misinformation game !

"Certainly low carb is popular among the members, I think to some extent we all eat below the RDA of carbs so in effect do low-carb, whether that's eating 30, 50, 100, 150 or 200g of carbs a day, but I do think your doing the best thing by finding your own way at low-carbing as we all have different tastes. Posted here by Noblehead who else ?"

Who believes a low carb diet is 100,150 or 200 grams a day other than the likes of Noblehead ?

A member on the same thread looking to lose more weight.

"I think it's fair to say that whilst I aim for LCHF, I don't always get it right. Some days I have more carbs than I'd have liked (but never normally above 150g unless it's a special occasion)" 

What Noblehead was saying a few years ago re weght loss.

"Noblehead September 4th, 2009, 12:05 pm deleted by Noblehead September 11th, 2012, 5:20 pm as posted here.

"I have seen dieticians, read books, spoke to my diabetic care team, and none have offered any constructive advice on controlling weight. Reading this forum has been helpful, and reading other peoples experiences in controlling their diabetes and improving Hba1c's, has been inspirational !

I can't recollect at any time been given advice on reducing carbs to control weight. I have always been told to eat plenty of carbs at every meal, together with the usual meat and veg. Once I was told that a bowl of cereal for breakfast was insufficient, and should include 2 slices of toast also. Looking back I can now see how flawed this advice/information has been"


As stated above Noblehead deleted much of his own post years later once his hypocrisy and skulduggery was posted on this blog. Full story here. 

The $64000 dollar question, why has Noblehead spent years spreading misinformation and posting negative comments re low carb ? when he once thanked low carbers for helping him to lose weight and other issues. The Lard works in mysteries ways, but Noblehead is something else. Is he on someone's payroll ? Is he trying to assist the DCUK management do a deal or flog the forum off to big pharma ? as reported here.

From Barry Summers Director at Diabetes Digital Media Limited - Diabetes.co.uk


"The aim of our business is to improve the quality of life to our online viewers, by providing access to high quality tools and information and education delivered via multiple channels via laptop, tablet and mobile applications.

We are interested to hear from investors, M&A groups, strategic partners, health insurance or pharmaceutical companies who have an interest in improving outcomes in the management and control of diabetes throughout the world. An ideal turn key beyond the pill distribution channel"


BTW The sales manager of DCUK done a Noblehead and deleted the big pharma spiel deal, when yet again we reported it here. As most clued up diabetics know, low carb usually results in no or minimal meds for a type two diabetic and much reduced medication for a type one diabetic. Big pharma has no interest in low carbers and even less I suspect in a forum where almost all the good news and success stories come about by low carbing. And for true low carbing, read 50 or less grams of carb per day, not Noblehead's misleading interpretation.


Eddie



Saturday, 26 September 2015

diabetes.co.uk Second letter to Mr. Panesar forum owner.

Mr. Panesar replied to my first open letter here. His letter is reposted here in quote marks and italics. My reply.

Dear Mr. Panesar

Thank you for your swift reply to my first letter.

At the time of writing this letter, I have two lines of thought. Do you have any idea what has gone on at your forum for years? and if not, as Captain of the ship, you are highly negligent. If you do know what has gone on, you are highly complicit in the lamentable situation observed by so many for years. What ever way you look at it, a very sad state of affairs indeed. Now I will answer the points raised in your letter.

“Thank you for your letter. I appreciate you taking the time to outline your concerns. But frankly, your complaints are based on a deliberate misinterpretation of what we do. The Diabetes Forum has played a key part in the low-carb movement: the community was the driver, and the forum the platform.”

No misinterpretation, I have commented on what I seen on your forum with my own eyes, as have countless others. We have the screenshots and links that prove the dishonesty, bullying, banning and duplicity that is the cornerstone of how your forum operates. Yes the community is the driver, not you, not your biased and corrupt mods. You have provided a platform, so have I, big deal. I don’t think you realise, it is the forum members who are the collateral, the real value, not the providers of platforms, the admin or the mods. It is the members who have provided 99% of the content, and they work for love, they work for free, not profit or self aggrandisement as you clearly do, as witnessed here.


A classic example of how your forum operates. Within recent days, one of the hardest working, most honest Lady I have ever known died. Her name was Hana, she posted over 8,000 posts on your forum. She helped people for years and was a total asset to the diabetes community. A great deal of her time at the forum, was spent fending off attacks and ridicule from the ‘usual suspects’. Your mods, their multiple accounts stooges and the 'protected ones'. (Multiple accounts are encouraged by your Admin as can be seen here.) What sickening hypocrisy we have been treated to by some of the ‘usual suspects’ who offer condolences after her sad and untimely death, yet done their best to make her forum life a misery at times. Hana never gave up, she worked to help others until the end. She kept her dignity, and never ever rose up, to the bait offered by people not fit to clean her shoes.


“You accuse us of deliberately silencing the low-carb voices on the forum as part of a collusion with pharmaceutical companies. As even the most cursory glance at our website shows, this is completely untrue. Here are just a few examples:”

I have not said you collude with pharmaceutical companies. I have merely quoted your words and those of Sales Director Barry Summers as seen here and here. You have made no secret of the fact you are looking for partnerships with pharma companies, you have also made no secret of the fact forum members are available for drug trials. You have silenced hundreds possibly thousands of low carbers by banning, thread locking, post deletion and post alteration. This I stated in my first letter to you, which you clearly chose to ignore. But the truth cannot be denied, even though you may choose to deny the facts staring you in the face.

"David Unwin publishes more evidence of low-carb diet benefits in the BMJ

“Ignore the guidelines, eat low-carb and high-fat”: Dr. Sarah Hallberg on how to reverse type 2 diabetes

Reversing type 2 diabetes low-calorie vs. low-carbohydrate

Low-carb diets and power of our community

“Every last shred of evidence”: Why low-fat dietary guidelines should never have been introduced"



Interesting you should list David Unwin's work and contribution to your forum. When he joined your forum, he was met with derision and ridicule from the ‘Usual suspects’ chief bully boy Sid Bonkers, aka The Enforcer, who said “Forgive me if am wrong but I smell a low carb troll here” he said this here, he went on to make other highly antagonistic and derogatory posts. The posts still stand. Nothing unusual for Sid, he has got away with this sort of behaviour for years, because he is one of the protected 'usual suspects' Dr. Unwin has stayed, many would have left, so many have, after receiving the Bonkers welcome pack and third degree. 

Incidentally the ‘usual suspects’ are a small group of low carb antis, who have been responsible for almost all the thread locking, banning, misinformation, and trouble on your forum. Some are ex mods fired in disgrace and some are present mods who make up the bulk of the wreckers and miscreants. I cannot argue that low carb features on your forum, let's face it, almost all the success is about low carb. How can you not pay at least lip service, when so many world renowned medical professionals are coming on board, and supporting low carb for not only diabetics, but for almost all.

The diet your anti low carbers cling to, as promoted by the NHS,DUK, BDA et al has failed diabetics totally and countless millions of others. The antis like to tell all, the low carb diet has not been proved in the long term. I put it to you and them, the diet has been used for around three million years. Man did not evolve on Mars Bars, Cornflakes, Coca-Cola and low fat yogurt. It was meat, fish, fat, vegetation, berries, nuts and seeds. Exactly the diet us low carbers eat and recommend, it's been one tough gig on your forum for so many. The low carbers have been many, the antis so few, but of course the antis have the ban button the delete button, and their posts stand, while many thousands of the low carbers posts have been deleted.

“We’ve published a book in association with Dr. David Cavan, head of Policy and Programmes at the IDF, on reversing type 2 diabetes. The book fully supports a carb-restricted diet.”


I look forward to reading it.


“We’ve published low-carb meal plans (and haven’t charged a penny for them) and thousands of low-carb recipes. We’re working on three projects (the details of which, for now, are top secret) focused on food.”

There are countless free recipes out there on the internet, including the Low Carb Diabetic sites. 'Free low carb meals plans book'. Is that the digitised book your members have to give huge amounts of their personal information to you to get? as seen here. and I presume this information provides sales mail shot and guinea pig lists for the big pharma trials that earns you money.


“The forum is full of low-carb success stories. You’ll notice that none of them have been banned or otherwise silenced.”

Completely wrong again. I know of many low carbers who posted in the low carb success thread including me, posts deleted and banned. With respect, have you spent more than a modicum of your time actually reading your own forum? I think not, if you had, you would never have had the audacity to make the comments you have made in your letter. Let alone pulling the character assassination job you tried on me.

“We have been featured in the Daily Mail, Mirror and a number of magazines where the diabetes community forum is referred to as the place individuals first find out about the benefits of low carb. Real people saying that if it wasn’t for the community and understanding the impact of food, their health wouldn’t have improved. The community is absolutely fantastic – propagating positive health outcomes through engaging.”

Agreed, but it is the low carb members who worked so hard to promote the low carb way, not you or your back-room staff, and certainly not the 'usual suspects' who have worked over-time to de-rail threads and make so many members life hard work to say the least. The low carbers have succeeded, despite the onslaught of counter attacks, by a few dozen people over the years. Very often aided and abetted by mods with a very dubious and tainted agenda. Can you remember who started the low carb way on your forum? Fergus, Dr. Katharine Morrison, Dennis, Timo, et al, all have walked, all worn down by the 'usual suspects'.

“I have a personal connection to all this: type 2 diabetes runs in my family. My grandmother passed away from heart complications. When my grandfather was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, I supported him in reducing his carbohydrate intake. His doctor is amazed by his blood glucose and HbA1c results.”

I am sorry to hear that, as I have said publicly I come from a family with four generations of type two diabetics. Chuffed to read your grandfather is doing well by reducing the carbs. Frankly I have never heard of a diabetic who did not improve his control by reducing carbs. As you say his Doctor is amazed at his HbA1c results. It really does make you wonder, why the low carbers have had such a tough time on your forum, does it not? Of course, there is very little money to be made by the heavy promotion of the low carb way. Big pharma becomes very nauseous and weak at the knees, every time they hear the words low carb I am told.

“Safe to say, we support low-carb. I support low-carb. But it doesn’t work everyone, and our project has never been about aggressively insisting on a particular lifestyle. The Forum, first and foremost, is a place of support, where members can respectfully and kindly debate diabetes management. We encourage these debates, but we demand that they be conducted decently. Health is a deeply sensitive issue, and we won’t tolerate bullying.”

I think I have covered the points raised in that paragraph.

“Which, unfortunately, is what much of your behaviour constituted. We saw the relentless trolling, bullying and victimisation of the diabetes community that you and your friends have spearheaded. I have consoled many members of the Diabetes.co.uk team and fielded calls from at least 15 people in the last 18 months alone, all of whom felt harassed and threatened by your community. Most of them agree with low-carb in principle.”

I make no apology for lampooning and shining the spotlight on bullies, liars, and treacherous people. If you have consoled members of your team and at least 15 people over the last 18 months, why has it taken so long for you to make your initial contact to me via twitter on Monday? My name, mug shot and contact details have been out there for years. I'll hazard a guess why you contacted me Monday, because you now realise far too many people, some in high places with great influence are reading my words. Not only reading them re-tweeting them to thousands of their followers. The duplicity and corruption at your forum is becoming widely known. Could you be on a damage limitation mission?

"You and your friends publicly “outed” Giverny, our forum moderator, because she didn’t align with your paradigm and attempted to troll her on Twitter simply to ‘get off’. You did the same to Ben when he was Forum Moderator. Your blog is littered with hatred and contempt for those that don’t share your agenda. Moderators have resigned because they couldn’t handle the harassment that ensued with supporting a moderate view to diet. You repeatedly victimise diabetes forum members who don’t share your world view. In 2014, you wrote a series of spoof blog posts about how wearing a turban would help improve blood sugar levels. As a Sikh, it was upsetting and insensitive; the behaviour of a man more interested in doling out personal abuse than having a constructive debate. The IP addresses were from the same pool as other accounts you had created. We took legal advice. We had a strong case to impose a cease and desist, but we didn’t pursue it: it’s a distraction and we don’t want to engage with it."

The outing of Giverny as you call it was a link to her then open twitter page. I will tell you why that was done. At the time she was the administrator on your forum. I am sure she is a very nice and honourable young lady. But a non diabetic, and clearly from her twitter page, far too young and inexperienced to be the admin of "Europe's Largest Diabetes Forum" I can assure you it was not to "get off" as you have stated. The Sikh spoof post was taken directly from your forum. I never ever wrote that and can prove it. Although we did take a copy and paste to illustrate the lunacy going on at your forum.

There can be no greater illustration proving how sound and vital information has been suppressed on your forum than this. A text book example of the 'usual suspects' at their most dangerous and devious best. As posted on this blog here.

A few days ago, the email 'newsletter' from Diabetes.co.uk flagged a very recent study which showed that Type 2 Diabetics taking insulin had up to 3 x the mortality rate of Type 2s taking, for example, metformin. The authors also flagged the mechanisms by which the higher mortality rates were induced by the action of insulin (i.e. they were linking the higher risk of death directly with taking insulin not with, for example, any differences in risk due to the existing health profile of people likely to be offered insulin).

This information was absolute dynamite, when you consider what sort of type two diabetic would be likely to be an insulin user. Clearly this would be a type two diabetic, who had failed to gain control of blood glucose, by other methods or non insulin medications. Not of course the typical low carbing diabetic. It is a fact the more carbs in the diet the higher the BG for diabetics, hence many need injected insulin. The low carb antis were not slow in realising the ramifications of this new information.

A full blitzkrieg was mounted, by the same wreckers and thread lockers, who have operated the same way for years. The same people that say they have nothing against low carb, while lying through their teeth. The same people that worked overtime to stifle yet another debate and get the thread locked. The thread did get locked by Giverny, the non diabetic forum administrator. Who stated “Thread closed. This isn't the place to be scaremongering and dishing out potentially dangerous information. The thread can be read here.

You accuse me of bullying, yet have the effrontery to make veiled accusations of me being a racist, a religious hater and a stalker of a woman much younger than my daughters. BTW I was contacted by the Coventry based Police, evidently no case to answer. Rather slippery of your outfit don't you think, when you could have contacted me direct. Tell me is there a reason you never return my telephone calls or reply to the messages left with your staff?

“Beyond this, what exactly are you accusing us of? Yes, we connect patients to clinical trials – in order to not only provide a very valuable service but also to generate revenue – which is significantly reinvested into worldwide education, apps and management services. Yes, we are (or were) a start-up. Yes we’re interested in hearing from insurance companies – but you don’t understand the motive. We want to help (and we are!). We have evidence to suggest that using services such as the diabetes forum or Diabetes PA helps improve control – and that in turn can reduce insurance premiums. It’s for the benefit of the community.”

Save it for the advertising agencies and spin merchants. I have no problem with an honest profit and a business making a return on investment. But like pretty much everything in this life, it's not what you do, it's how you do it. I think I have made it manifestly clear, I don't like the way you do it. You are running an exploitation outfit in my opinion. Other great forums do not make the harvesting of members information, the selling of products, services and drug guinea pig trials their raison d'ĆŖtre. Needless to say, low carbers need none of the aforementioned. 

"When I was presenting the benefits of the diabetes community and the Hypo Awareness Program, having been nominated for Social Enterprise of the Year, and I was asked ‘why is your profit so low?’ The answer I have to the interviewer is the same I will give to you: because profit is not our motive."

Please forgive me, I have skipped most of the paragraph that included the above. Years ago when your forum was in it's infancy, Major Banks and big company advertising was flashing across your masthead, now each time I check, it's the win a free meter competition, no one ever lost. The meal guide features very heavily, but no big name companies. Do you ever wonder why that is? could it be the movers and shakers realise of the 200k members you constantly talk about, most left a long time ago, could it be because less that 1% of the forum members are regular posters. One thing cannot be denied, the forum offers no finer master-class in potential customer alienation. It is very clear to see why, if you take the time to look.

"I ask you to sincerely engage with what we’re achieving, rather than picking fights on spurious grounds. Look at what we Diabetes.co.uk and the diabetes community has done over the past three years. 10 years ago, the prospect of reversing type 2 diabetes was implausible. Now it’s very much a reality."

Nothing spurious about my accusations, I have talked fact. We have the links, the copies of threads, the screen shots. I will say much more at a later date, I expect many of the readers of this letter lost interest or nodded off a long time back. If you are still with me anyone, I admire your stamina and fortitude, bet most of you are low carb high fat, with that long range built in keto adapted fuel tank. You talk of three years, Fergus showed us the way over seven years ago at your forum, long before it went downhill, and Dr Richard Bernstein has been preaching the good word for decades.

"As always, you’re welcome to come to our offices for a chat. We have nothing to hide – we’re improving the health outcomes of those who engage with us – and we’re proud of that."

Sounds very cosy, but I will pass on that. For me that's a 200 mile four hour round trip, and my experience so far trying to track you down, has been about as successful as an NHS diet. I am proud of what I am doing, I was born to do what I have done, for fellow diabetics for over seven years. But I never forget, I am only a messenger, and so very fortunate, to work with an incredible team of people. People whose only agenda is to help and inform others. With them with me I cannot fail.


I look forward to your reply, I hope we can move forward. I hope we can progress matters. Hope is what we sell Mr. Panesar, hope and sound information, and we have never received a penny.

Yours sincerely

Eddie Mitchell

Thursday, 7 August 2014

From Barry Summers Director at Diabetes Digital Media Limited - Diabetes.co.uk

"Diabetes digital media limited owns and operates www.diabetes.co.uk - the largest diabetes information website in Europe receiving almost 10 million unique visitors per annum (800,000 people a month).The website has an active forum that has over 88000 members and when surveyed advised that the management of diabetes had improved since becoming a forum member. In addition we engage people with diabetes via Facebook and the diabetes.co.uk Facebook page has over 100,000 followers. We generate significant data from registered users and surveys, we recently conducted a survey with 20,000 diabetic patient responses to a 58 question survey gathered over a period of seven days.

The company is about to launch a market leading diabetes mobile app that will help people with diabetes throughout the world, with a reporting function allows readings to be provided to health care professionals.In mid 2014 we are launching a type 2 online education and wellness program that will offer an opportunity to reach type 2 patients worldwide to improve the health and management of the condition beyond medication. The program addresses understanding, nutrition, exercise and uniquely emotions and is scalable to reach a global audience compared to an offline program.

Mid 2014 we will be launching international sites in the image of diabetes.co.uk to expand the business reach globally with the knowledge that all the applications are able to become
multi lingual.

The aim of our business is to improve the quality of life to our online viewers, by providing access to high quality tools and information and education delivered via multiple channels via laptop, tablet and mobile applications.


We are interested to hear from investors, M&A groups, strategic partners, health insurance or pharmaceutical companies who have an interest in improving outcomes in the management and control of diabetes throughout the world. An ideal turn key beyond the pill distribution channel."

Is it any wonder why so many low carbers were banned or bullied off the forum over the years ? Is it any wonder a small group of low carb antis have ruled the roost ? Low carbers will cost big pharma a fortune, the last thing they want is to get involved with a forum, that almost all the success stories, are talking about the low carb salvation for so many diabetics.

So there you have it folks, as I have said so many times before, DCUK an exploitation outfit, and the above confirms it. The truth always outs, it just takes time.

Hat tip to the anonymous commenter for the link to the above. My bold red.

Eddie

Sunday, 2 April 2017

Diabetes.co.uk diabetic saviours or parasites?

Checking into twitter yesterday, I saw the tweet below, my first thought was, this is an April fools joke surely. 1.8 million kilo's of weight loss, how did they ever come up with that number? The outfit I call the forum of flog, appears to have problems understanding numbers. From the main site front page today. "Get support from 231,354 people" and "Join 552,285 members today and get a free member pack" so, how many members have they got? 231,354 or 552,285? More importantly, how many are active, a single number percentage I reckon. 

Joining the forum of flog has much in common with the Hotel California "You can check in anytime you like, but you can never leave" The mailshot below was received by Graham yesterday, a member of our team here, and banned from the flog years ago. We know of many other long since banned members on the mail shot list, long since banned or left, who no-doubt are included in the "numbers" 



Latest mailshot to members.


Graham is one of the many type two diabetics who has never been over weight, in fact losing weight is the last thing he needs.

I notice the Coventry Telegraph is not mentioned in this more accomplished than usual mail shot to the masses "One of the ways the website makes money is by charging to put organisations such as pharmaceutical companies doing medical trials in touch with forum members who have diabetes" Arjun Panesar forum owner Coventry Telegraph 3/8/2015.

Not so long ago the Sales Manager Barry Summers was stating publicly "We are interested to hear from investors, M&A groups, strategic partners, health insurance or pharmaceutical companies who have an interest in improving outcomes in the management and control of diabetes throughout the world. An ideal turn key beyond the pill distribution channel" This was swiftly deleted when quoted on the low carb diabetic blog.

Now we see the flog is trumpeting "able to come off medication" precisely what so many flog banned member's were confirming years ago. How times change, it appears a tie up with big pharma may not be as profitable as once envisaged. The last thing big pharma wants to know, is an outfit helping to reduce the massive amount of money spent on  unnecessary diabetes drugs. We do know they pay well for private and confidential information, as confirmed by Mr. 
Panesar

It would be very unfair of me, to claim the forum has not done a huge amount of good. In the early days it helped me and many of my diabetic friends. It continues to help countless people. How tragic so many people in need of sound advice (advice the management are now shouting from the roof tops) were railroaded off the forum, by a corrupt few, while the management turned a blind eye. How many more could have been helped? we will never know.

What a great pity that for so long highly knowledgeable people, such as Dr. Jay Wortman the low carb expert and type two diabetic, was banned not once, but twice, and said on his blog "Not only banned totally expunged" When the award winning Doctor Unwin joined the forum, he was written off as a troll by a long term member. So much ridicule of medical professionals, on the low carbers side, has been allowed to stand for years.

But let us never forget. The forum members supply around 99% of the forum content for free, and the mods work unpaid. Meanwhile, Panesar's parasites appear to be claiming the glory.

Last word to US General George S. Patton Jr.

"For over a thousand years Roman conquerors returning from the wars enjoyed the honour of triumph, a tumultuous parade. In the procession came trumpeteers, musicians and strange animals from conquered territories, together with carts laden with treasure and captured armaments. The conquerors rode in a triumphal chariot, the dazed prisoners walking in chains before him. Sometimes his children robed in white stood with him in the chariot or rode the trace horses. A slave stood behind the conqueror holding a golden crown and whispering in his ear a warning: that all glory is fleeting.


As always, the forum management are most welcome to comment here.

Eddie

Friday, 14 November 2014

DCUK How to do a deal with big pharma and play the misinformation game !

A repost but just as relevant today in light of more thread locking, post deletion and banning and threatening of low carbers over the past week or so.

"Certainly low carb is popular among the members, I think to some extent we all eat below the RDA of carbs so in effect do low-carb, whether that's eating 30, 50, 100, 150 or 200g of carbs a day, but I do think your doing the best thing by finding your own way at low-carbing as we all have different tastes. Posted here by Noblehead who else ?"

Who believes a low carb diet is 100,150 or 200 grams a day other than the likes of Noblehead ?

A member on the same thread looking to lose more weight.

"I think it's fair to say that whilst I aim for LCHF, I don't always get it right. Some days I have more carbs than I'd have liked (but never normally above 150g unless it's a special occasion)"

What Noblehead was saying a few years ago re weght loss.

"Noblehead September 4th, 2009, 12:05 pm deleted by Noblehead September 11th, 2012, 5:20 pm as posted here.

"I have seen dieticians, read books, spoke to my diabetic care team, and none have offered any constructive advice on controlling weight. Reading this forum has been helpful, and reading other peoples experiences in controlling their diabetes and improving Hba1c's, has been inspirational !

I can't recollect at any time been given advice on reducing carbs to control weight. I have always been told to eat plenty of carbs at every meal, together with the usual meat and veg. Once I was told that a bowl of cereal for breakfast was insufficient, and should include 2 slices of toast also. Looking back I can now see how flawed this advice/information has been"

As stated above Noblehead deleted much of his own post years later once his hypocrisy and skulduggery was posted on this blog. Full story here.

The $64000 dollar question, why has Noblehead spent years spreading misinformation and posting negative comments re low carb ? when he once thanked low carbers for helping him to lose weight and other issues. The Lard works in mysteries ways, but Noblehead is something else. Is he on someone's payroll ? Is he trying to assist the DCUK management do a deal or flog the forum off to big pharma ? as reported here.


From Barry Summers Director at Diabetes Digital Media Limited - Diabetes.co.uk
"The aim of our business is to improve the quality of life to our online viewers, by providing access to high quality tools and information and education delivered via multiple channels via laptop, tablet and mobile applications.

We are interested to hear from investors, M&A groups, strategic partners, health insurance or pharmaceutical companies who have an interest in improving outcomes in the management and control of diabetes throughout the world. An ideal turn key beyond the pill distribution channel"

BTW The sales manager of DCUK done a Noblehead and deleted the big pharma spiel deal, when yet again we reported it here. As most clued up diabetics know, low carb usually results in no or minimal meds for a type two diabetic and much reduced medication for a type one diabetic. Big pharma has no interest in low carbers and even less I suspect in a forum where almost all the good news and success stories come about by low carbing. And for true low carbing, read 50 or less grams of carb per day, not Noblehead's misleading interpretation.

Eddie

Thursday, 24 September 2015

diabetes.co.uk An open letter to forum owner Mr. Arjun Panesar

Dear Mr. Panesar

I have some views to express and comments to make regarding your forum.

Almost from the very start of the forum and with only a couple of thousand members, the stand out news was the low carb diet. A day never went by without members reporting outstanding success in the control of their diabetes. Within days of trying the low carb diet, members were seeing non diabetic blood glucose numbers on their BG meters for the first time. The much needed weight loss for some members was almost effortless and lipid panels improved dramatically. Very often this amazing turnaround was achieved with nil or reduced medication. The simplistic beauty of this highly successful diet, is all the diabetic has to do, is eat whole fresh foods and drop the highly processed refined carbs and sugar. No need for starvation diets, no need for medication in many cases, and no downside whatsoever. What could possibly go wrong?

Unfortunately the forum soon degenerated into a war zone at times. A small group of anti low carbers, who preferred to follow the dietary guidelines of the National Health Service, The British Dietetic Association and the largest UK diabetes charity Diabetes UK, caused arguments and spread misinformation at every opportunity. The aforementioned nationwide organisations basically state, a diabetic can follow the same diet as any non diabetic and use medication to bring blood glucose levels down to a safe level. Unfortunately this does not work for the majority of diabetics. This fact is confirmed by the annually published NHS diabetes survey audited statistics. The total number of confirmed diabetics increases every year and no improvements in the all important blood glucose numbers, confirmed by HbA1c tests, are being made whatsoever.

To sum up, a newly diagnosed type two diabetic, approximately 90% of all diabetics are type two, has choices to make. Does he change his diet and stop eating many of the nutrient lite and very often factory made highly processed foods, which are doing him no favours at all, or does he continue to eat the foods that played a major contribution to becoming a diabetic, and cover the highly elevated and dangerous blood glucose numbers with medication. As stated earlier the NHS stats prove the latter does not work for the majority of diabetics, one must also realise most type two diabetes drugs are expensive, ineffective and carry side effects, some serious enough to have been banned in recent times. Clearly for the straight and logical thinker, the only safe way to go is dietary changes and the nil or minimal medication route. There are no known negative side effects in consuming whole fresh foods, none whatsoever.

Back to the forum. With so much success reported by countless diabetics type two and one, from the start of the forum, to the present day, via a low carb diet, why have hundreds of low carbers been banned? From well meaning and knowledgeable laymen and women to highly respected low carb experts such as Dr. Jay Wortman a low carbing type two diabetic. Why have countless thousands of low carbers posts been deleted over the years (well over two thousand of mine alone). Why has banning, thread locking, deleting and or editing of members posts been allowed to go on. The situation borders on the unbelievable, when you consider this massive wanton destruction and vandalism has been conducted by around a dozen individuals, mostly past and present forum moderators.


Why have honest, even-handed and highly knowledgeable mods resigned using this sort of language “A forum whose administration team have consistently shown poor management, questionable moral judgement” and “A moderation approach that stifles meaningful discussion” and “Members banned who have actively supported said community over the past six months... the sort of members that DCUK should be protecting and nurturing in order to ensure a strong community going forward”. The obvious question must be, has this happened because of a very small group of dishonest, underhand and totally biased mods, or does the problem go deeper? Could commercial reasons and considerations have a part to play in the years of dishonesty and the often appalling treatment of the rank and file members. Members who dared to ask a straight question, members who dared to constructively criticize, members who fell foul, of extremely unfair interpretations of the forum rules and clear abuses of moderator power.

Well, it must be taken into consideration diabetes.co.uk is a business as you Mr. Panesar recently stated in the on line 'Start Ups' website "We’re aiming to become the world’s largest diabetes community within the next 18 months, not just Europe’s. Financially, we’re aiming at turning over £8m a year" and in the Coventry Telegraph "One of the ways the website makes money is by charging to put organisations such as pharmaceutical companies doing medical trials in touch with forum members who have diabetes". Your Sales Director Barry Summers not so long ago stated publicly "We are interested to hear from investors, M&A groups, strategic partners, health insurance or pharmaceutical companies who have an interest in improving outcomes in the management and control of diabetes throughout the world. An ideal turn key beyond the pill distribution channel"


Astute observers have said, if a large proportion of diabetics went low carb, at least two major pharmaceutical companies would go out of business. That is purely conjecture, but without doubt there is very little money to be made in promoting a low carb diet. A forum that seeks to be the largest in the world and turnover £millions per year would also lose out financially in my opinion, especially if the low carb diet became the mainstay of safe and reliable diabetes control. The financial ramifications are clear and obvious, when the public statements from the forum owners have have made it abundantly clear and without equivocation, partnerships with big pharma feature highly in their plans.

I look forward to hearing from you in due course, receiving any comments and to answering any queries or questions you may have.

Your sincerely

Eddie Mitchell