Thursday 31 May 2012

Thread Deletion Addictive?


Is thread deletion addictive? The ghost forum of Ken, Albert, Angeleyes, Wrunkelt, Silver Fox, Cugila, Kamon, Highlanders and Sue has now deleted threads (posted by Ken, Albert, Angeleyes, Wrunkelt, Silver Fox, Cugila, Kamon, Highlanders and Sue) critical of D.CO.UK, Benedict and other D.CO.UK members.

Thread deletion was a common tactic of Ken, Albert, Angeleyes, Wrunkelt, Silver Fox, Cugila, Kamon, Highlander and Sue when the thread’s content  threatened discredited positions held by Ken, Albert, Angeleyes, Wrunkelt, Silver Fox, Cugila, Kamon, Highlanders and Sue.

Now in deleting their own posts you have to question the mental state of Ken, Albert, Angeleyes, Wrunkelt, Silver Fox, Cugila, Kamon, Highlanders and Sue. Or is it, that thread deletion is the equivalent of crack cocaine  for Ken, Albert, Angeleyes, Wrunkelt, Silver Fox, Cugila, Kamon, Highlanders and Sue?

We would ask sympathetic readers (yes we know that these are likely to be rather low in numbers) to suggest suitable rehab centres or activities that
(a)    could take Ken, Albert, Angeleyes, Wrunkelt, Silver Fox, Cugila, Kamon, Highlanders and Sue’s mind off the humiliating circumstances in which they find themselves and
(b)   be of the appropriate intellectual level.

To start the ball rolling:


CliqueFinder General

11 comments:

  1. From the Kenster earlier on ABC......"Too right Eric, anyway this thread is going to die soon.........." Didn't he mean to write 'Forum' instead of 'Thread'?:D

    Simon

    ReplyDelete
  2. Would the following be of any help to Ken, Albert, Angeleyes, Wrunkelt, Silver Fox, Cugila, Kamon, Highlanders and Sue

    “On deletion in threaded binary trees

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0196677486900301

    Abstract
    We determine the explicit performance of deletion algorithms which have to maintain threads in a binary tree. In particular, it is shown that the cost of threads on deletion is not as high as might be expected, and is especially low for right-threaded trees. The results are obtained by using recurrences to compute the average cost of deleting a single node from both threaded and unthreaded trees. As an illustration of the technique, a new derivation of the average cost of insertion into binary search trees is presented

    ReplyDelete
  3. CliqueFinder General31 May 2012 at 15:56

    I think you may have misunderstood the term ‘thread deletion’ and also the capabilities of Ken, Albert, Angeleyes, Wrunkelt, Silver Fox, Cugila, Kamon, Highlanders and Sue. Thanks for trying.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Would this be suitable?

    http://www.pomsinoz.com/forum/jobs-careers/128191-pipefitters-thread.html

    John

    ReplyDelete
  5. At least Ken is deleting his own posts on his Forum. Lots of new lies tho.

    ReplyDelete
  6. CligueFinder General31 May 2012 at 17:41

    This look to be just right for Ken and the gang.

    They should feel right at home here.

    http://www.psychforums.com/delusional-disorder/

    ReplyDelete
  7. "Google also removed a couple of libelous comments about me from his blog"

    More lies from the demented and deranged Kenster.

    Eddie

    ReplyDelete
  8. Eddie I saw that comment. He really has lost the plot. Loneliness can be very debilitating. Probably explains his arguing with himself and then deleting his posts because he disagrees with himself.

    John

    ReplyDelete
  9. Are you saying that he trolled under all those names? Even the name “Sue”? Reminds me of the Johnny Cash song “A Boy named Sue”.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Don't you mean:
    Ken, Albert, Angeleyes, Wrunkelt, Silver Fox, Cugila, Kamon, Highlanders and Sue AND EricD.

    Utterly, utterly, pathetic to watch a man having a conversation agreeing with himself.

    ReplyDelete
  11. He's got more sock puppets than a Punch and Judy convention!

    ReplyDelete

The lowcarb team value your comments. Thank you for taking the time to contribute to our blog. Please note! negative comments and insults from anonymous idiots, with nothing to add to the debate will not be authorised. However, we welcome constructive criticism.

The best of health to you and yours.

Eddie