Wednesday, 21 November 2018

New Major Study: A Calorie Is Not A Calorie




"Despite what the sugary beverage and processed snack food companies want us to believe, all calories are not created equal.

A new study from Harvard shows that individuals following a low-carbohydrate (20% of total calories) diet burn between 209 and 278 more calories at rest (each day) than those on a high-carbohydrate (60% of total calories) diet. So the type of calories we eat really does matter. 

The New York Times: How a low-carb diet might help you maintain a healthy weight 

This isn’t the first study to investigate this topic, but it is likely the best. 

The current study was a meticulously controlled, randomized trial, lasting 20 weeks. Even more impressive, the study group provided all the food for participants, over 100,000 meals and snacks costing $12 million for the entire study! This eliminated an important variable in nutrition studies — did the subjects actually comply with the diet — and shows the power of philanthropy and partnerships in supporting high-quality science. 

After a run-in period where all subjects lost the same amount of weight, participants were randomized to one of three diets: 20% carbs, 40% carb, or 60% carbs, with the protein remaining fixed at 20%. Importantly, calories were adjusted to stabilize weight and halt further weight loss, thus making it much more likely that any observed difference in calorie expenditure was not from weight loss, but rather from the types of food consumed. 

After five months, those on the low-carb diet increased their resting energy expenditure by over 200 calories per day, whereas the high-carb group initially decreased their resting energy expenditure, exposing a clear difference between the groups. In addition, those who had the highest baseline insulin levels saw an even more impressive 308-calorie increase on the low-carb diet, suggesting a subset that may benefit even more from carbohydrate restriction. 

Why is this important? It shows why the conventional wisdom to eat less, move more and count your calories is not the best path to weight loss. Numerous studies show better weight loss with low-carb diets compared to low-fat diets, and now studies like this one help us understand why. 

Our bodies are not simple calorimeters keeping track of how much we eat and how much we burn. Instead, we have intricate hormonal responses to the types of food we eat. It’s time to accept this and get rid of the outdated calories in-calories, calories-out model, thus allowing for more effective and sustainable long-term weight loss. 

Additional coverage of this dramatic new study: 

LA Times: The case against carbohydrates gets stronger (by study author Dr. David Ludwig) 

The Times: Low-carb dieters “shed more weight” 

MedPage Today: Low-carb diet wins for weight maintenance "

All words and picture above from Diet Doctor site here

All the best Jan

21 comments:

  1. Very good information, thanks! Valerie

    ReplyDelete
  2. Counting calories may not be the best path to weight loss, but it's the only path that works for me.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for sharing, interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I know that sugar is bad for you but it sure does make eating more tasty! I have gotten back into sugar since my surgery almost 2 yrs ago and I need to find a way to stop wanting it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Interesting study. I'm glad it's this way as I was never one to count calories.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is very interesting and helps explain why low carb diets work so well. And perhaps some of why I feel I have more energy on them.

    ReplyDelete
  7. How nice to get positive affirmation of your chosen life style.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hello Jan!
    This is a new study that I didn’t know!
    Thank you for sharing all those interesting informations!
    Have a relaxing evening!
    Dimi...

    ReplyDelete
  9. I won't be watching any tomorrow while eating mass amounts

    ReplyDelete
  10. We are certainly complex in the way our bodies work.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Interesting. So much of what was accepted as "science" was just a theory.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thanks for the great information. As always, enjoy your day.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Very interesting info, thanks for sharing.

    ReplyDelete
  14. It's an interesting study, thanks for the read!

    ReplyDelete
  15. This has been over all the news here in the states this past week, I have found this to be true in my diet so I already knew this.

    ReplyDelete
  16. This is very interesting! Thank you!

    ReplyDelete

The lowcarb team value your comments. Thank you for taking the time to contribute to our blog. Please note! negative comments and insults from anonymous idiots, with nothing to add to the debate will not be authorised. However, we welcome constructive criticism.

The best of health to you and yours.

Eddie