Total Pageviews

Friday, 5 February 2016

Big Pharma’s big push to get patients to take their meds

Drug companies around the globe are spending big to push patients to take their pills.

The pharma industry loses tens of billions in worldwide sales each year when patients don’t fill, or refill, their prescriptions.

So drug makers from London to Tokyo to Cambridge, Mass., are pouring money into programs aimed at cajoling — or nagging — patients to take every last pill their doctors prescribe. The companies are investing in smart pills that will send alerts when they haven’t been swallowed at the prescribed time. They’re subsidizing gift cards to thank patients who remember to refill. They’re paying patients to go on talk circuits to tout the virtues of taking medication properly.

They’re even lobbying the federal government for permission to pay third parties, such as pharmacists, to encourage patients to take their pills.

Drug companies say these investments are focused on improving patients’ health. “We’re not pushing pills here, we’re pushing adherence,” said Joel White, president of the Council for Affordable Health Coverage, an advocacy group that works with the industry.

But Matt Lamkin, an assistant professor at the University of Tulsa College of Law who’s studied the issue, sees another motive.

Pharma companies have the sense “that they are leaving billions on the table” when medicine isn’t taken and prescriptions aren’t filled, Lamkin said. The push to improve adherence, he said, “reframes the goal of boosting sales as a goal of public service.”

Of course, when patients fail to take their meds, they’re not just hurting drug makers’ bottom line. Poor adherence to prescription medications has been estimated to drive up medical spending in the United States by nearly $300 billion each year. Patients sometimes end up sicker when they skip too many pills both for acute conditions and for chronic diseases like diabetes and multiple sclerosis.

It’s a complicated problem. Patients may decide not to fill prescriptions because they don’t have the money or can’t get to a pharmacy.

Another big reason pills get skipped: They just don’t work very well. Significant percentages of patients don’t respond to the medications they’re prescribed or experience serious side effects.

Pharma companies traditionally have tried to address the financial concerns with rebates and the health concerns by staffing hotlines that patients can call with questions.

Now, however, they’re going further.

In the past, drug companies “weren’t as likely to have a view on what should be done in clinical practice or systemically,” said Tom Hubbard, vice president of policy research at the Network for Excellence in Health Innovation, which counts pharma companies among its members. “These days, interest is considerably greater.”

Take GlaxoSmithKline. The London-based drug maker has enrolled 3,000 of its employees, retirees, and their family members in North Carolina in a pilot program to better coordinate their health care. Among other things, it uses sophisticated analytics to determine who’s not sticking with their medication. Those individuals can get one-on-one health counseling with a pharmacist or case manager, according to Matt Rousculp, a senior director of health outcomes research for GSK.

The industry is also pushing solutions more directly focused on making sure patients remember their pills.

Japanese giant Otsuka Pharmaceutical is collaborating with Silicon Valley startup Proteus Digital Health on the first “smart pill,” embedded with an ingestible sensor that could send a patient or a doctor alerts when it’s swallowed — or when a dose is missed. They’re seeking approval for the technology from the US Food and Drug Administration.

The big drug maker Novartis, which runs its research and development in Cambridge, Mass., was an early investor in Proteus. And Novartis is also working with the mobile chip giant Qualcomm to develop an inhaler that would record the date and time of every use, to improve adherence in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.


Graham

3 comments:

Launna said...

Ah ... that's crazy, I am totally against this. I don't want any phamacare company or doctor telling me when to take my pills. I understand some people need to take them but there is free will ...

Tara Crowley said...

If you don't want to take your pills, tell the doc you are no good at compliance, and save everyone the hassle. If you're taking pills that work for you and you really need, usually you set up a system to ensure that you take them. I have my weekly container for my morning and evening meds. I take them religiously because I benefit from each and every one. Meds that give me unwanted side effects or don't do squat, I never refill. Simple.

Big pharma can remind me all they want. in the end, it is my choice. My acupuncturist doesn't try to get me to take herbs anymore. I've told her, I'm on many meds, I don't want to introduce herbal meds to the mix, and I have a history of being very noncompliant when I have herbal mixtures made up for me. So I just stopped.

Crafty Green Poet said...

Tara is right, we have free will. There is a tendency for doctors to overprescribe - partly because of the pressure big pharma puts on them, partly because many patients don't want to leave the surgery without some sort of prescription.

Drugs that work and relieve symptoms without side effects are easy to take, because you notice the positive effects on your life. Drugs that don't relieve the symptoms or that have huge side effects are easy, you stop taking them and push your doctor to give you an alternative. Drugs that relieve symptoms but give noticeable though not major side effects or are treating something that doesn't show as a symptom are much more difficult.