Total Pageviews

Sunday, 17 February 2013

Proliferative retinopathy or macular edema in diabetics.

Some years ago just after I became a diabetic, I found this presentation by Professor Roy Taylor, MD, FRCP. Roy Taylor is one of the foremost diabetes experts in the UK. Roy deals in facts not fiction and the presentation left me stunned. Part of the general gist was the fact that diabetes was a progressive disease and good control did not change finale outcomes by an appreciable factor. “not because it's getting better. Unfortunately the people with the complication die” a sobering statement yes. I thought about this presentation and came to few conclusions that may be highly relevant to many diabetics. That it very important how a diabetic gets to good blood glucose numbers and also age is a very important factor. We know ramming down BG numbers with medication is not the answer, the ACCORD study proved this. Also some of the data although accurate and relevant was from a time when the majority of type two diabetics were older at diagnosis, i.e. middle aged or old aged. This could explain the high death rates in the type two slide.

Eddie


Let's consider type 1 diabetes with the prevalence of proliferative retinopathy or macular edema. The bars show the proliferative retinopathy. And by 30 years of diabetes about half of the type 1 diabetic patients studied in Wisconsin some years ago had proliferative change. Macular edema is peaking at about 15%. Retinopathy is common. Serious retinopathy is also common.


We move on to consider type 2 diabetes. Type 2 diabetes is somewhat different. The retinopathy plateau here is less, 65%. Why might that be? In the previous example when you saw that the prevalence of serious retinopathy declined with increasing duration, that's not because it's getting better. Unfortunately the people with the complication die. The others are the survivors. But in type 2 diabetes we have a rapid attrition, a high mortality, and the prevalence would actually continue to rise if we were plotting it as a cumulative figure.


To see the full presentation by Professor Roy Taylor, MD, FRCP you need to be a Medscape member. It takes a couple of minutes to sign up, anyone can join and the site has a massive amount of information.

Link to presentation and sign up here.



     


2 comments:

Steve P said...

Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes are to me two different illnesses.Being a Type 2 I do my best to keep my blood sugars down to a low level. The slightly worrying aspect of this study is that the age of diagnosis for a growing number of type 2 is getting lower and now people in their 30's and lower are being diagnosed. This study shows a higher death rate of an older generation which you might expect. What I wouldn't be happy to see is younger people being diagnosed and still death rates happening at the same time span - this could lead to death rates occurring in their mid fifties if diagnosed at 40 and not having good control, or even younger if diagnosis was made at 30 yrs.
Very disturbing thoughts and highlights the need to get and maintain good blood sugar numbers.

Lowcarb team member said...

Hi Steve

I agree 100%. It’s bad enough becoming a type two diabetic at 60 years of age and passing on 15 years later. But people of 30 are being diagnosed and it is becoming common. 45 years of age is no age to go especially with a controllable disease like type two. Also I believe changing the life style that contributed to type two will ensure a person does not check out within 15 years. We know why so many die within 15 years, very poor dietary advice and far too much medication.

Regards Eddie