Over at the forum formally know as ETYM, which took around nine months to heed my advice, and place diabetes in the forum name. Then banned me for taking on Grazer and co, and their ridiculous dietary advice, the bullshit continues, today Grazer The Great stated this.
"Might be worth reading (or re-reading if you've already seen it) the welcome note we have;
www.diabetessupportforum.org/forum/recen...er-welcome-note.html
On there, we suggest people start at 50% of GDA carbs, which is 150 grams for a man, 125 for a woman, then test to see if you need to adjust further. Some of course start higher, others immediately go low carb; but test, and what works for you is fine."
So, how many of the forum members have obtained good blood glucose levels on this sort of carb intake ? I'll spare you the research, one! Grazer.
He knows it, we know it, but still this dullard clings on to the ludicrous advice.
BTW telling him this was another reason I was banned. I could be wrong but until Grazer has the forum to himself, I doubt he will be happy. One thing is for sure, dynamite could not shift this guy.
Eddie
Link to the Grazer post here.
Please check out our website www.lowcarbdiabetic.co.uk We created and maintain this site without any help from anyone else. In doing so, we do not receive direct or indirect funding from anyone. We do not accept money or favours to manipulate the evidence in any way. Please visit our Low Carb food and recipe blog www.lowcarbdietsandrecipes.blogspot.com
2 comments:
I have been a bit concerned at some of the advice about medication handed out recently.
I don't understand how those who don't need meds themselves and never have should consider themselves experts.
Thank goodness that, so far at least, the indispensable Daibell has been there to set all straight.
Kath
Grazer sees himself as an expert, always has and always will. He thinks he knows more than anyone else on ETYM, same as he did on DCUK and thinks that his "knowledge" will bring in more members. It is a pity that he has no humility only vanity.
Post a Comment