Total Pageviews

Wednesday, 13 March 2013

Low Fat Challenge: Win Cash !

Since the Dietary Goals for the United States were published in 1977 suggesting everyone increase their carbohydrate intake and decrease their fat intake, has there been any evidence to support this recommendation? Find some and win money.


Challenge

The challenge is simple:

1. Find clinical trials supporting today's standard of care as compared to a low carbohydrate diet. A randomized control trial in which a calorie-restricted, low fat, diet results in more weight loss than a low carbohydrate diet, with or without a calorie limit. (Criteria)

2. Submit them by email to info@awlr.org.

3. Donate to the pot and increase the stakes.

After the challenge has concluded, the person(s) who find such trials will win a 40% of the donation pot. The remaining 60% (or entire pot if no winners) will be donated to theNutrition Science Initiative*.

History

In February of 1977, the first ever Dietary Goals for The United States were released, in response to the fact that "six of out ten of the leading causes of death have been linked to our diet." The Government, the report explains, "has an obligation to acknowledge this. The public wants some guidance, wants to know the truth, and hopefully we can lay the cornerstone for the building of better health for all Americans, through better nutrition."

What ensued for the next 35 years was the largest increase in obesity the world has ever seen.
Picture
Not all members of the Dietary Goals committee were in agreement. Charles H Percy, a Ranking Minority Member voiced his concern for what was being done:
In fact, because I recognize many will read or hear only about the Dietary Goals….I feel the American public would be in a better position to exercise freedom of dietary choice if it were stated in bold print on the Goals and Food Selection pages that the value of dietary change remains controversial. And that science cannot at this time insure that an altered diet will provide protection from certain killer diseases such as heart disease and cancer…I recognize the desirability of providing dietary guidance to the public ... In my judgment, however, the best way to do this is to fully inform the public not only about what is known, but also what remains controversial regarding cholesterol, the benefits of dietary change, and the reliability of food intake data. Only then, will it be possible for individual consumers to respond optimally to the Dietary Goals in this report.

Of course, many changes occurred during this time period which could have independently contributed to the obesity epidemic, and simply implicating this correlation as proof that the dietary goals were the cause would be naive and irresponsible. However it is reasonable to ask a simple question:
Graham

2 comments:

Steve P said...

Personally I think the low fat high carb way has done enough damage to our health but to our present teenagers I fear the damage has been done. Trials research information must be made widely known and more emphasis given to a high fat low carb way forward. It is slowly becoming more widely acclaimed but progress still remains too slow.

Lowcarb team member said...

My worry Steve is the amount of younger people being diagnosed with Type 2, unlike me they have a lifetime ahead of them. Check out this thread Any T2's out there who are 35 or under? over at DCUK

Graham