Total Pageviews

Thursday, 31 May 2012

Thread Deletion Addictive?


Is thread deletion addictive? The ghost forum of Ken, Albert, Angeleyes, Wrunkelt, Silver Fox, Cugila, Kamon, Highlanders and Sue has now deleted threads (posted by Ken, Albert, Angeleyes, Wrunkelt, Silver Fox, Cugila, Kamon, Highlanders and Sue) critical of D.CO.UK, Benedict and other D.CO.UK members.

Thread deletion was a common tactic of Ken, Albert, Angeleyes, Wrunkelt, Silver Fox, Cugila, Kamon, Highlander and Sue when the thread’s content  threatened discredited positions held by Ken, Albert, Angeleyes, Wrunkelt, Silver Fox, Cugila, Kamon, Highlanders and Sue.

Now in deleting their own posts you have to question the mental state of Ken, Albert, Angeleyes, Wrunkelt, Silver Fox, Cugila, Kamon, Highlanders and Sue. Or is it, that thread deletion is the equivalent of crack cocaine  for Ken, Albert, Angeleyes, Wrunkelt, Silver Fox, Cugila, Kamon, Highlanders and Sue?

We would ask sympathetic readers (yes we know that these are likely to be rather low in numbers) to suggest suitable rehab centres or activities that
(a)    could take Ken, Albert, Angeleyes, Wrunkelt, Silver Fox, Cugila, Kamon, Highlanders and Sue’s mind off the humiliating circumstances in which they find themselves and
(b)   be of the appropriate intellectual level.

To start the ball rolling:


CliqueFinder General

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

From the Kenster earlier on ABC......"Too right Eric, anyway this thread is going to die soon.........." Didn't he mean to write 'Forum' instead of 'Thread'?:D

Simon

Whalelover said...

Would the following be of any help to Ken, Albert, Angeleyes, Wrunkelt, Silver Fox, Cugila, Kamon, Highlanders and Sue

“On deletion in threaded binary trees

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0196677486900301

Abstract
We determine the explicit performance of deletion algorithms which have to maintain threads in a binary tree. In particular, it is shown that the cost of threads on deletion is not as high as might be expected, and is especially low for right-threaded trees. The results are obtained by using recurrences to compute the average cost of deleting a single node from both threaded and unthreaded trees. As an illustration of the technique, a new derivation of the average cost of insertion into binary search trees is presented

CliqueFinder General said...

I think you may have misunderstood the term ‘thread deletion’ and also the capabilities of Ken, Albert, Angeleyes, Wrunkelt, Silver Fox, Cugila, Kamon, Highlanders and Sue. Thanks for trying.

Lowcarb team member said...

Would this be suitable?

http://www.pomsinoz.com/forum/jobs-careers/128191-pipefitters-thread.html

John

Anonymous said...

At least Ken is deleting his own posts on his Forum. Lots of new lies tho.

CligueFinder General said...

This look to be just right for Ken and the gang.

They should feel right at home here.

http://www.psychforums.com/delusional-disorder/

Lowcarb team member said...

"Google also removed a couple of libelous comments about me from his blog"

More lies from the demented and deranged Kenster.

Eddie

Lowcarb team member said...

Eddie I saw that comment. He really has lost the plot. Loneliness can be very debilitating. Probably explains his arguing with himself and then deleting his posts because he disagrees with himself.

John

Anonymous said...

Are you saying that he trolled under all those names? Even the name “Sue”? Reminds me of the Johnny Cash song “A Boy named Sue”.

William said...

Don't you mean:
Ken, Albert, Angeleyes, Wrunkelt, Silver Fox, Cugila, Kamon, Highlanders and Sue AND EricD.

Utterly, utterly, pathetic to watch a man having a conversation agreeing with himself.

Anonymous said...

He's got more sock puppets than a Punch and Judy convention!