Cardiologist Dr. William Davis writes:
"Confusion over cholesterol issues is everywhere and shared by most people, including doctors. Unfortunately, it means that, by seeing your primary care doctor or even cardiologist, you are being advised with information that is superficial and largely ineffective while ignoring the MANY issues that really should be addressed to manage risk for cardiovascular disease. Admittedly, these are somewhat complicated issues and even I have been guilty at times of giving overly simplistic answers. I’ll try to keep this as straightforward as possible, but it is a bit hairy.
I blame this situation on the statin drug industry, as they have painted a misleading picture that, if you take a statin drug or reduce LDL cholesterol, you are absolved of cardiovascular risk. The exaggerated statistical manipulations used by industry—“Lipitor reduces cardiovascular events by 36%” when the real value is, at best, 1%, not to mention the fact that the majority of statin data was paid for by statin manufacturers, a big no-no in any other industry—persuaded practitioners that statins and cholesterol reduction were virtual cures. They are not, of course, as anyone in healthcare who witnesses all the people admitted to the hospital with heart attacks, angina, and sudden cardiac death taking statin drugs will attest. The statin drug industry has therefore caused doctors to wear blinders, rarely looking beyond statins and cholesterol.
So what exactly don’t they know about cholesterol? Plenty. For example:
Cholesterol does not occur as free molecules in the bloodstream, as they are fats and would separate from the aqueous plasma. Cholesterol is therefore solubilized by being complexed within lipoprotein particles—fat-carrying proteins—and cell walls. Even if you eat something rich in dietary cholesterol, such as an egg yolk, it does not enter the bloodstream as cholesterol but as complex particles such as chylomicrons created in the intestines or VLDL particles manufactured by the liver.
Because up until the mid twentieth century, characterization of the various lipoproteins in the bloodstream was laborious and technically challenging, researchers in the 1950s and 1960s devised a crude workaround: estimate the number of lipoproteins in various fractions of the blood (low-density, very low-density, high-density levels in centrifuged plasma) by measuring a select component. They selected cholesterol, as it was easier to measure. Problem: Using cholesterol as an indirect means of estimating lipoproteins means that you have to assume that everyone shares similar lipoprotein composition, an assumption that is potentially and commonly inaccurate. A crude equation (the Friedewald calculation) was also devised to not measure, but calculate, LDL cholesterol, the focus of most mainstream efforts to reduce cardiovascular risk. LDL cholesterol is calculated from total cholesterol in the entire sample minus the cholesterol in the high-density and very low-density fractions. Once again, assumptions were made to allow this calculation. Cholesterol is therefore a crude marker for the particles that cause atherosclerosis, but that should also not be construed to mean that cholesterol is therefore causal.
When LDL cholesterol, the darling of the pharmaceutical industry and most doctors, is compared to superior measures that actually quantify and characterize lipoproteins (nuclear magnetic resonance, gel electrophoresis, ultracentrifugation), there is a statistical correlation of the two measures in large populations, but poor correlation when applied to an individual. LDL cholesterol, i.e., the cholesterol in the low-density lipoprotein fraction estimated via calculation, also tells you nothing about the number of lipoprotein particles, their size, their surface conformation, their binding characteristics, oxidative state, etc. In other words, LDL cholesterol tells you virtually nothing when applied to a specific individual.
If you cut dietary fat and saturated fat and observe the effects on lipoprotein number and composition, you will witness minor effects, such as a reduction in total LDL particle number but increase in the proportion of small LDL particles, increased VLDL particles, decreased HDL particle number and a shift towards less functional small HDL. Cut grains and sugars and you will witness dramatic transformation of lipoprotein composition and number, effects that handily and dramatically outperform the trivial effects of statin drugs.
Of all the measures on a standard cholesterol or lipid panel, it’s triglycerides that offer the most insight, as triglycerides track the number of very low-density lipoproteins, VLDL, closely. VLDL particles are crucial because they begin the process of transforming large, benign, short-lived LDL particles into small, harmful, oxidation- and glycation-prone, long-lived LDL particles (via a complex process called “heteroexchange” of cholesterol for triglycerides followed by enzymatic “remodelling” of the LDL particle). Where does VLDL come from? Consumption of grains and sugars that fuel liver de novo lipogenesis that converts carbs to triglycerides.
HDL cholesterol, a useful index of overall metabolic health, is reduced by cutting dietary fats, since this increases triglycerides/VLDL that lead to HDL degradation and clearance, and reduced by statins such as Lipitor. HDL is raised, often dramatically, by increasing fat consumption and decreased grain and sugar consumption.
Detailed lipoprotein analyses have been available commercially for over 20 years but are not commonly used, as it requires (as you can appreciate) a deeper understanding of lipoprotein metabolism and do not point towards statins as the solution—they quickly point towards diet and efforts to correct factors such as inflammation and insulin resistance corrected, for example, by losing visceral fat, supplementing vitamin D, and cultivating healthy bowel flora that also contribute substantially to overall health, i.e., all the strategies we put to you" ...
Picture and words above taken from 'Wheat Belly Blog', more to see and read here
All the best Jan
24 comments:
It sometimes seems that whatever advice you get from one doctor or dietician will be rejected by another. It is a maze out there!
Dr Axel Sigurdsson in Iceland has some very good articles or the general public on cholesterol and heart disease.
See:
https://www.docsopinion.com
-Steve
Really interesting how science is proving what is the culprit concerning chlorestral.
Steve Parker, M.D. said...
Dr Axel Sigurdsson in Iceland has some very good articles or the general public on cholesterol and heart disease.
See:
https://www.docsopinion.com
-Steve
Many thanks for this link Steve.
All the best Jan
Interesting. The thing about nutrition is you need to be an organic chemist to really understand how everything happens. I think the biggest issue is all the processed food in our diets and the chemicals you find there. Thanks for sharing. I didn't know cholesterol was the randomly picked fat to monitor.
Fortunately my cholesterol is fine for now, more blood pressure for me
this is some really great information!! the in's and out's of high cholesterol, what causes it, to treat or not to treat!! each of my doctors are in favor of treating it, i am always on the fence but mine is very high!!
So much to learn. Luckily I have not had any cholesterol issued.
A lot to take in and digest when it comes to medicine. So often we trust the professionals who tell us we need to do something- like take a drug- but now we are learning how often big pharmaceuticals influence what is prescribed/recommended. Lots of researching needs to be done! Thanks for sharing this interesting and informative article.
~Jess
I am excited about diabetic's potential and I can't wait to see how it will grow in the future.
It's a really troubling subject. To be told by a GP to take statins as a preventative, yet looking at the side effects of them really makes me wonder.
Thanks for the article and also for the link provided by Steve Parker. Sue :D)
Thanks for the article, Jan.
Research should always be independent of the money of those who stand to profit/lose from it. Always.
Thank you for reposting.
This is all so confusing.
Thanks for posting this detailed information. Old myths die hard. I suspect that our tendency to think pleasure is bad is part of the belief that fat in food is dangerous.
Thanks Jan.
Some times it is a heredity thing too.
Statins (and their manufacturers) have a lot to answer for
It's all just a minefield isn't it!
we are on the mercy of medicine industry more than any other
Hmm ~ lots of 'food for thought' in this article ~
Happy Day to you,
A ShutterBug Explores,
aka (A Creative Harbor)
It is so sad that the manufacturers of drugs can sway doctors into not giving the actual correct advice to their patients, that is why we need to be so active in our health
Thanks for this article! I just found out that my cholesterol is almost 300. My sugar is 107. I am taking BP meds that causes elevation of b.sugar. I also take synthroid in high dosage for me, doc. order. I have been refusing statins but now I am "what to do?" The BP meds also causes weight gain. I have gained plenty. The only solution is not to eat...live on water. !!?
I am not eating any noon meals in hope when I re-check in 5 months it will look better.
It gets sooo complicated! Again ..thanks.
Post a Comment