Total Pageviews

Friday 15 June 2012

ADA: Glycemic Control Reduces CV Risk !

By Chris Kaiser, Cardiology Editor, MedPage Today
Published: June 13, 2012
Reviewed by Dori F. Zaleznik, MD; Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston and Dorothy Caputo, MA, BSN, RN, Nurse Planner

PHILADELPHIA -- Diabetes patients who responded to glucose-lowering treatment also improved their risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, a Swedish observational study found.
Those who reduced their hemoglobin A1c levels by nearly one percentage point -- from a mean of 7.8% to 7% -- had a significant 45% decreased risk of cardiovascular death (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.63, P<0.001), according to Katarina Eeg-Olofsson, MD, from the University of Gothenburg in Sweden, and colleagues.
The absolute risk of a death from a cardiovascular cause was 9.9 events per 1,000 person-years in patients with decreasing HbA1c and and 17.8 per 1,000 in those with stable or increasing HbA1c, the team reported here at the annual meeting of the American Diabetes Association.
The above results were after the researchers adjusted for covariates such as age, diabetes duration, sex, blood pressure and blood pressure treatment, lipid status and lipid-lowering treatment, HbA1c, albuminuria, and BMI, as well as changes in those risk factors and treatments over time.
The research team said that they undertook the study because of the ongoing debate about the relationship between glycemic control and adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
They analyzed data from the Swedish National Diabetes Register and identified 18,035 patients with baseline HbA1c between 7% and 8.9%. They ranged in age from 30 to 75, had a body mass index over 18 kg/m2, and serum creatinine ≤1.7 mg/dL.
Patients with a history of cardiovascular disease, congestive heart failure, or atrial fibrillation were excluded from the study. The mean duration of diabetes was between 8 and 10 years and the median follow-up was more than 5 years.
Patients were nearly equally divided into those whose HbA1c decreased by 0.1% or more (mean baseline HbA1c 7.8% and final 7.0%) and those whose baseline remained stable or increased (mean baseline HbA1c 7.7% and final 8.3%).
Besides the decrease in total mortality, the researchers found that better glycemic control was significantly associated with risk reductions in fatal and nonfatal coronary heart events of 39% (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.69) and in fatal/nonfatal cardiovascular disease events of 37% (HR 0.63, 85% CI 0.57 to 0.70). The decreases were both significant at P<0.001.
According to the researchers, the absolute risk of a first fatal or nonfatal event caused by coronary disease was 10.3 per 1,000 person-years for those who had better glycemic control versus 17.9 per 1,000 for those without better control.
Those numbers for a first cardiovascular event were 15.1 and 26.1 events per 1,000 person-years, respectively.
Eeg-Olofsson noted that these patients were receiving routine care for type 2 diabetes, which shows that targeting HbA1c to 7% (the treatment target) can help mitigate the higher risk of cardiovascular events generally seen in diabetics.


Lowcarb team member said...

Quote from the jopar!

"But I really don't call a 1% drop of HbA1c as significant not when it doesn't bring somebody into the top end of non-diabetic figures!"

There's idiots and idiots and then there's jopar!


Anonymous said...

And to top things off,Kenny Boy is ranting again on the ghost ship forum ABC and now everythings Borofergie's fault this time..Apparently! kamon,erm I mean C'mon Ken,Is that the best you've got?


Lowcarb team member said...

"And to top things off,Kenny Boy is ranting again on the ghost ship forum ABC and now everythings Borofergie's fault this time..Apparently! kamon,erm I mean C'mon Ken,Is that the best you've got?"

It's xyzzy's whose incurred the wrath of Ken today Simon, Ken is saying he needs to take a course in manners! which is a bit bit rich from him who must be one of the most ill mannered oafs on the internet.


Pot and Ketttle said...

Sid Bonkers said.

"I dont think it is very clever to ridicule someone elses dietary beliefs is it? In fact I thought it was against forum rules, but perhaps they dont apply to low carbers. If you disagree with someone elses views then explain why you disagree perhaps but dont ridicule them."

This from Sid who pours scorn and ridicules all those who don't subscribe to his views.

Pot and Kettle

Anonymous said...

Sid(Kim) has more faces than the town hall clock!

Lowcarb team member said...

quote from Bonkers:

"Paul & Becca I suggest you both read the 'Ethos and Forum Rules'"

This from Sid who totally ignores the forum Ethos and Rules especially were it states "Ethos and Forum Rules - Please read + be NICE!"