Total Pageviews

Monday 17 September 2012

Sugar really does rot your brain: study !

People whose blood sugar is in the high end of the normal range may be at greater risk of brain shrinkage that occurs with ageing and diseases such as dementia, according to an academic from The Australian National University.
Dr Nicolas Cherbuin, from the Centre on Ageing, Health, and Wellbeing in the ANU College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, studied 249 people aged 60 to 64 who had blood sugar in the normal range. The participants had brain scans at the start of the study and again, on average, four years later.
“Numerous studies have shown a link between type 2 diabetes and brain shrinkage and dementia, but we haven’t known much about whether people without diabetes with blood sugar on the high end of normal experience these same effects,” said Dr Cherbuin.
“Blood glucose levels are measured in millimoles per litre (mmol/l), a normal blood glucose level is considered to be between 4.0 and 6.1 mmol/l. Those with higher blood sugar levels within the normal range were more likely to have a loss of brain volume in the areas of the hippocampus and the amygdala – areas that are involved in memory and cognitive skills – than those with lower blood sugar levels.”
After controlling for age, high blood pressure, smoking, alcohol use and other factors, the researchers found that blood sugar on the high end of normal accounted for six to 10 per cent of the brain shrinkage.
“These findings suggest that even for people who do not have diabetes, higher blood sugar levels could have an impact on brain health,” Dr Cherbuin said.
“More research is needed, but these findings may lead us to re-evaluate the concept of normal blood sugar levels and the definition of diabetes.”
The study was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

Still want to stick with the Nice guidelines?


Anonymous said...

what's your excuse?

Anonymous said...

Yet more thoughts and evidence that sugar, carbohydrates may have a lot to answer for. Do we need them ? Do we need them in the quantities that some digest each day ? More and more the answer is becoming clearer, no cut them down. Whether you are a diabetic, or not, it clearly is better to lower the intake and as for the Nice guidelines the words disgraceful and disappointing come to mind.


Kay said...

Picking up on Grahams comment about the Nice guidelines.

NICE would argue that these figures are guidelines, but to those more informed diabetics we know the harm that higher bg numbers do.

I would raise the point (as Joe does) do we need as much sugar and carbohydrates? For me I would answer no. The damage too much sugary starchy foods do is becoming clearer and clearer at almost every report or study that goes to print.

Anonymous said...

Found this a very interesting piece which both diabetics and non diabetics should read. I do hope that money is made available in order that more research and follow up will continue.

Anonymous said...

"NICE would argue that these figures are guidelines, but to those more informed diabetics we know the harm that higher bg numbers do."

Yes, those in the know do, and we also know we do not need too much sugar and starchy food that a lot out there do consume.

I guess all we can do is to keep spreading the word that sugary stuff needs a skull and crossbones sign on them.

Reckon the NICE guidelines could do with changing but who's to bet they may increase them.....HELP