Lipoprotein is a spectrum, classified into subclasses by size. Its role is to transport triglycerides, a type of fat found in the blood. But just like PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin 9), researchers aren’t sure why we have even triglycerides.
Presentations at the 10th Annual Cardiometabolic Health Congress (CMHC 2015) in Boston, Massachusetts specifically looked at cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Henry N. Ginsberg, MD, Irving Professor of Medicine at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, spoke about the latest analysis on triglycerides and what to expect next.
In the Framingham Heart Study, 5,127 patients with no history of coronary heart disease (CHD) were evaluated. Higher levels of triglyceride were linked to more relative CHD risks. Notably, women seem to be more denoted at risk of triglyceride because their levels are typically higher than men by 50%. So when a woman has a high level, say over 200 mg/dL, it’s probably going to have a greater affect.
Ginsberg referenced a meta-analysis made up of 17 studies that determined that triglyceride level is an independent cardiovascular disease risk factor. With fasting and nonfasting triglyceride being a hot topic of debate, another meta-analysis including 29 studies consisting of nearly 250,000 people indicated that fasting linked to CVD events. On the other hand, low triglyceride and low LDL (low density lipoprotein) levels were associated with less events. Notably, patients with high levels of triglyceride are still at risk for CVD regardless of being on statins.
Hypertriglyceridemia is also a risk factor for atherosclerosis – but why? Well, there’s old-fashioned and new-fashioned ideas about the disease which causes plaque to build up in the arteries. Ginsberg detailed the different understandings during the presentation.
- Very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) can enter the artery wall
- Associated with increased factor VII, fibrinogen, and PAI-1
- Associated with other lipid abnormalities
- VLDL can enter the artery wall
- It’s the cholesterol and apoC-III, not the triglyceride
Triglycerides are both a risk factor and target for therapy. One approach is using fibrates, a class of amphipathic carboxylic acids for metabolic disorders, has proven to work very well. The Helsinki Heart Study reported a 34% CVD reduction with Gemfibrozil and the BIP trial showed a 7.3% CVD reduction. CVD outcomes in trials with fish oils have been a mixed bag. The JELIS study showed positive results in the first phase that turned up negative in the second. Others like the Origin trial showed negativity in pre-diabetic and diabetic.
But are there any drugs that lower triglyceride levels with lowering apoCIII, or vice versa? “I don’t think so,” Ginsberg said. “It’s going to be hard to tease out but if it works, it works.”
Talk about missing the point! Trigs are far and away the easiest "lipid" to change via diet. Drop the carbs and trigs fall through the floor.
IMO LDL has been targetted as a "cause" of CVD because drugs have been marketed which can reduce it. HDL was briefly looked at but the drugs to increase it didnl't work. Yet again a sensible diet will increase HDL as well as reducing trigs, and that DOES work because it changes the metabolism, not just the end result.
This was all known decades ago and is currently being "reinvented" like a wheel with fewer corners than the previous model.
Drugs, drugs, drugs, is all these people think about. I don't want any of what they're taking! I recall the fibrates are a pretty nasty bunch too. Any basic medical textbook will tell you that dropping carbs makes the trigs fall right away. And high carb intakes lead directly to high levels of small dense LDL.
I don't think they will ever build a drug that can give as great an improvement in the risk factors as lowering carb intake does effortlessly and without adverse effects.
Post a Comment