Total Pageviews

Friday 25 April 2014

Why I believe Lisa is 100% right part 1 (see post below this post)

Today a negative comment came in from someone calling themselves 'party pooper' "So absolutely no evidence provided - it is only what Lisa thinks!" Most negative posts come in from anons, and in this case I think the anon has a considerable amount of poo between the ears. Anyway, enough of this jovial banter, let's cut to the chase. This the first post backing up Lisa'a post and what I believe to be sound information. Make up your own minds. Eddie


The gruesome NHS audit figures for HbA1c for England. HbA1c is arguably the most important factor to avoid diabetic complications. Most of the numbers in this audit are way above the level serious organ damage occurs.

Results for England. The National Diabetes Audit 2010-2011

Percentage of registered Type 1 patients in England

HbA1c >= 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) = 92.6%
HbA1c > 7.5% (58 mmol/mol) = 71.3%
HbA1c > 10.0% (86 mmol/mol) = 18.1%

Percentage of registered Type 2 patients in England

HbA1c >= 6.5% (48 mmol/mol = 72.5%
HbA1c > 7.5% (58 mmol/mol) = 32.6%
HbA1c >10.0% (86 mmol/mol) = 6.8%


Similar stats. reported for the previous five years.

http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB06325


Cancer feeds on sugar

Otto Heinrich Warburg won the Nobel prize for discovering.

“Cancer, above all other diseases, has countless secondary causes. But, even for cancer, there is only one prime cause. Summarized in a few words, the prime cause of cancer is the replacement of the respiration of oxygen in normal body cells by a fermentation of sugar.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Heinrich_Warburg

Fat does not cause heart disease and without dietary fat we die.

A meta-analysis published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, pooled together data from 21 unique studies that included almost 350,000 people, about 11,000 of whom developed cardiovascular disease (CVD), tracked for an average of 14 years, and concluded that there is no relationship between the intake of saturated fat and the incidence of heart disease or stroke.

Conclusions: A meta-analysis of prospective epidemiologic studies showed that there is no significant evidence for concluding that dietary saturated fat is associated with an increased risk of CHD or CVD. More data are needed to elucidate whether CVD risks are likely to be influenced by the specific nutrients used to replace saturated fat.

http://www.ajcn.org/content/early/2010/01/13/ajcn.2009.27725.abstract


The causes of metabolic syndromes, type two diabetes and obesity.

The low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet, promulgated vigorously by the National Cholesterol Education Programme, National Institutes of Health and American Heart Association since the Lipid Research Clinics-Primary Prevention Program in 1984, and earlier by the US Department of Agriculture food pyramid, may well have played an unintended role in the current epidemics of obesity, lipid abnormalities, type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndromes.

This diet can no longer be defended by appeal to the authority of prestigious medical organisations or by rejecting clinical experience and a growing medical literature suggesting that the much-maligned low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet may have a salutary effect on the epidemics in question.

Sylvan Weinberg, former president of the American College of Cardiology

http://content.onlinejacc.org/article.aspx?articleid=1133027

The lower the HbA1c the less the complications.


For every percentage point drop in A1C blood test results (from 8.0 percent to 7.0 percent, for example), the risk of diabetic eye, nerve, and kidney disease is reduced by 40 percent. Lowering blood sugar reduces these microvascular complications in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Intensive blood sugar control in people with type 1 diabetes (average A1C of 7.4%) reduces the risk of any CVD event by 42 percent and the risk of heart attack, stroke, or death from CVD by 57 percent.

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa052187#t=articleTop

Carbohydrates not essential.

There are three kinds of foods--fats, proteins, and carbohydrates. All of these provide calories. But the carbohydrates provide calories and nothing else. They have none of the essential elements to build up or to repair the tissues of the body. A man, given carbohydrates alone, however liberally, would starve to death on calories. The body must have proteins and animal fats. It has no need for carbohydrates, and, given the two essential foodstuffs, it can get all the calories it needs from them."

Sir Heneage Ogilvie, former vice president of the Royal College of Surgeons, England.

Carbohydrates are a common source of energy in living organisms; however, no carbohydrate is an essential in humans.

http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/75/5/951.2.full






2 comments:

Anonymous said...

The evidence is available for all willing to research. Sugar causes trouble we don't need.

Perhaps the same could be said for 'party poopers' whatever shape or size!

Paul B

Anonymous said...

I wish more would realise carbohydrates are not essential, the world and its population would be healthier.

Anne